The article is devoted to the modern French historiography of the Napoleonic era in the context of the concept of historical memory. Even though many new methodological works have appeared in European science in recent years, offering alternative options for reading historical memory, French historical science is far behind methodological innovations. Based on an analysis of the methodological and historical principles of French research, the author identified two main areas developing in relation to the history of memory of the Napoleonic era. Firstly, the study of the image of the emperor as an instrument for the formation of political symbolism and factors contributing to its actualization. Secondly, research into the problems of constructing a memory of tragedies as an element of national consolidation. At the same time, researchers noted that the images of defeats, thanks to regular actualization, turned out to be most memorable for the French than the victories of Napoleon. Within the framework of this direction, the author emphasized the monograph by J.M. Largeaud, dedicated to a detailed analysis of the specifics of the French memory of Waterloo. The author concluded that historians appeal to the tragic images of war is usually limited to the national framework. So, turning to ideas about wars, historians only fragmentally touched on the problems of Russian and British memory, once again demonstrating the exceptional concentration of French science on problems of a narrowly national nature. Finally, most of the work continues to focus on the concept of P. Nora, which, apparently, cannot be perceived today as a universal approach to the problems of historical memory.
Napoleonic era in perception of modern France
Postnikova Alyona
The study is sponsored by the Russian Science Foundation, grant 20-18-00113.
References:
Bonnet J.C. L’Empire des Muses. Napoléon, les Arts et les Lettres. Paris, 2004.
Boudon J.O. Les habits neufs de Napoléon. Paris, 2009.
Boudon J.O. Napoléon et la campagne de Russie 1812. Paris, 2012.
Chaillou D. Napoléon et l’Opéra. La politique sur scène – 1810–1815. Paris, 2004.
Chanteranne D. Napoleon à l'écran. Paris, 2003.
Duby G. Le Dimanche de Bouvines. Рaris, 1973.
Forrest A. Russia, the Moscow Campaign and the Making of the Napoleonic Legend // Elektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal «Istoriya». T. 11. Vyp. 4 (90). 2020.
Hazareesingh S. La légende de Napoléon. Рaris, 2005.
Jourdan A. Mythes et légendes de Napoléon. Toulouse, 2004.
La bataille de Waterloo: symbole de victoire, de défait et lieu de mémoire. Рaris, 2015.
Largeaud J.M. Napoléon et Waterloo: La défaite glorieuse de 1815 à nos jours. Рaris, 2015.
Les Lieux de mémoire: Les France. Рaris, 1984.
Le Goff J. History and memory. New York, 1992.
Dépasser le cadre national des "Lieux de mémoire". Bruxelles, 2014.
Napoléon et l’Europe / Éd. par T. Lentz. Рaris, 2005.
Nora Р. «L'Autre bataille de Bouvines». Рaris, 2005.
Peudon J.L. La campagne de 1814 récit et lieux de mémoire: Le jugement de Clausewitz. Рaris, 2014.
Petiteau N. Napoléon de la mythologie à l’histoire. Рaris, 1999.
Polémique autour des célébrations du bicentenaire de la bataille d'Austerlitz // Le Mondе. 2005. 3 décembre.
Rey M.P. L’effroyable tragédie: une nouvelle histoire de la campagne de Russie. Рaris, 2012.
Nora P. «Istoriki ponyali, chto zakony - opasnaya veshch'» // Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2002. № 3.
Promyslov N.V. Napoleonovskaya epoha v fokuse antropologicheskogo podhoda. Razmyshleniya nad novymi knigami// Elektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal «Istoriya». T. 11. Vyp. 4 (90). 2020.
Tchoudinov A.V. 200-ie Egipetskogo pohoda Napoleona Bonaparta: istoriya neudachnoj kommemoracii // Elektronnyj nauchno-obrazovatel'nyj zhurnal «Istoriya». T. 9. Vyp. 10 (74). 2018.