Before the French Revolution, there was a rich tradition of comprehension of the term "citizen", dating back to Antiquity, to Aristotle. The meaning of this concept evolved from a member of a community (city-state) participating in the exercise of political power to a bourgeois who had certain rights and privileges within the city, and further, already in the Modern times and the Age of Enlightenment, to a full member of the political organism created as a result of a social contract. Such great minds as J. Bodin, T. Hobbes, S. von Pufendorf, B. Spinoza, J. Locke, C.-L. de Montesquieu, J.-J. Rousseau contributed to the understanding of this term. Only the American War of Independence forced these theoretical considerations to be translated into practice and to decide how the sovereignty of the nation would be implemented in practice. In 1789, this most difficult problem arose before the deputies of the Estates General, who proclaimed them the National Constituent Assembly: they had to determine who would henceforth be not just a subject of the king, but a citizen of the renewed France, what rights and obligations he would have from now on, and how he should exercise one of the most important rights in practical terms – the right to vote. This was also due to the fact that a new understanding of the concept of citizenship turned out to be necessary for the legitimization of the new government after the collapse of the Old Order in France. Since then, the term “citizen” itself, the images of “citizen”, “citizen king”, “citizen soldier” became one of the foundations of revolutionary propaganda.
The creation of a citizen (evolution of the concept of «citizenship» in the Early Modern time)
Bovykin Dmitry
The study was supported by a grant of the Russian Science Foundation, project No. 25-18-00108 (https://rscf.ru/en/project/25-18-00108/).
References:
Wallerstein I. Mir-sistema moderna. T. 4. Triumf centristskogo liberalizma, 1789–1914. Moscow, 2016.
Tyrsenko A.V. Jemmanjujel' Zhozef Sijes i francuzskaja liberal'naja mysl' ego vremeni. Moscow, 2005.
Aberdam S. Démographes et démocrates. L’œuvre du comité de division de la Convention nationale. Paris, 2004.
Azimi V. L’ «exhérédation Politique» de la femme par la Révolution // Revue historique de droit français et Étranger. 1991. № 2. P. 177–215.
Durand Y. Sujets // Dictionnaire de l’Ancien Régime. Royaume de France XVIe – XVIIIe siècle / Sous la dir. de L. Bély. Paris, 2006. P. 1187.
Fauré Ch. Doléances, déclarations et pétitions, trois formes de la parole publique des femmes sous la Révolution // Annales historiques de la Révolution française. 2006. № 2. P. 6–15.
Forrest A. L'armée de l'an II : la levée en masse et la création d'un mythe républicain // Annales historiques de la Révolution française. 2004. № 335. P. 111–130.
Gueniffey P. Le nombre et la raison. La Révolution française et les élections. Paris, 1993.
Heater D. A Brief History of Citizenship. Edinburgh, 2004.
Larivière R. La présence des femmes dans les assemblées primaires du Bas-Limousin en mars 1789 // Bulletin de la Société des lettres, sciences et arts de la Corrèze. 1989. P. 51–54.
Larivière R. Les femmes dans les assemblées de paroisses pour les élections aux États-généraux de 1789 // Bulletin d’histoire économique et sociale de la Révolution française. 1974. P. 123–156.
Magnette P. Citizenship History of an Idea. Colchester, 2005.
Martin J.-Cl. Nouvelle histoire de la Révolution française. Paris, 2019.
Pocock J.G.A. The ideal of citizenship since classical times // Theorizing Citizenship / Ed. by R. Beiner. New York, 1995. P. 29–52.
Tomei S. Citoyenneté et suffrage universel en France depuis la Révolution. Humanisme. 2009. № 284 (1). P. 42–50.